Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10587 14
Original file (NR10587 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
ErRAR Livi! wae

701 3S: COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 16 1

KRLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

ARL

 

JSR
Docket Nc WNR10587-14
4 Decemne 14

 

Dear Gunnery Sergeant ieee

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of
United States Code, section 15

iu

bia
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your

application on 4 December 2014. Your allegations of
injustice were reviewed in accordance with adminis
regulations and procedures applicable to tl

4

Board. Documentary material considered by the Boar
O Ss

ir application, together with all material submi

   

a

s connection, the Board subst 1a
contained in the report of the PERB.

‘cation has been denied. The name a

4 1
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot Dé taken You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new

i n the date of the Boara’s decision.
prior to making its decision in this case. In this regard, it
is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Sincerely,

ROBERT J. O'NEILL

Executive Director

 

 

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5740 14

    Original file (NR5740 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR5S740-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11287 14

    Original file (NR11287 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by CNRFC letter 5420 Ser N1/0194 dated 4 March 2015 and CNRFC letter 5420 Ser N1/0562 dated 16 May 2014, copies of which are attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR11287-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3792 14

    Original file (NR3792 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC memo 7220 MPO of 12 Aug 14, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3450 14

    Original file (NR3450 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 5420 MMEA dated 4 August 2014, a copy of which is attached. NR3450-14 ay 4 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to iemanieaee the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2696 14

    Original file (NR2696 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 31 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5159 14

    Original file (NR5159 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4714 14

    Original file (NR4714 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5103 14

    Original file (NR5103 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and , applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NR5103-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3978 14

    Original file (NR3978 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR3978-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6180 14

    Original file (NR6180 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. appropriate reentry code based on your » Situation.